Notably, states also receive and deliver electricity to other states, so the carbon intensity of generation in a state does not necessarily reflect the carbon intensity of the electricity used in that state. The carbon intensity of power generation varies by state because the mix of fuel sources used to generate electricity is different in different states. Nuclear power plants and non-emitting renewables, such as hydroelectric, wind, and solar power, produce little to no CO 2 emissions. Natural gas was less carbon intensive than coal at 980 lbs of CO 2/MWh. In 2020, the carbon intensity of coal in the United States was 2,274 lbs of CO 2/MWh. power generation averaged 854 pounds of CO 2 per megawatthour (lbs of CO 2/MWh), but carbon intensity varies by energy source. states decreased their carbon intensity over that five-year period, although the amount of the decrease varied widely. The carbon intensity of power generation measures the amount of CO 2 emitted to produce a unit of electricity. electricity generation mix away from coal and toward natural gas and renewables. power generation fell 18%, driven by a shift in the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Power Plant Operations Reportįrom 2016 to 2020, the carbon intensity of U.S. The products and services herein described in this press release are not endorsed by The Maritime Executive.Data source: U.S. “In addition, should a ship fall short of its desired rating, analytics can identify the impact of different options for CII improvement - such as auxiliary system adjustments, speed reduction, hull cleaning, alternative fuels or carbon-capture.” “AI and Machine Learning create a straightforward pathway to derive the carbon intensity rating, but can also be useful for operational guidance to benchmark a voyage plan against CII,” Kastsikas said. Serafeim Katsikas, CTO at METIS Cybertechnology, said that the new CII rating regime offered an example of how managing data analytics at the individual ship level best helped owners to meet their efficiency and decarbonisation goals. “We are therefore proactive in putting in place the monitoring and analytics to deliver accuracy, transparency and predictive capability on lower carbon shipping.“ Michael Reppas, Managing Director of SEA WORLD. “It’s critical that our investments in new technologies reflect our quality-assured management systems and services,” said Capt. Athens-based SEA WORLD and SEA GLOBE are applying METIS predictive analytics and CII evaluation across a fleet of 19 of their wet tankers.ĭrawing on a CO2 monitoring system sampling emissions more than once every 30 seconds, METIS uses a ship’s known characteristics, including its machinery performance, fuel oil consumption, fouling, cargo weights and exposure to weather, to derive its CII rating. The CII evaluates vessel efficiency in terms of grams of CO2 emitted per cargo capacity and nautical mile, with IMO developing performance categories spanning a highly desirable ‘A’ to an unacceptable ‘E’.īuilding on its existing cloud platform infrastructure, METIS is applying its cutting-edge data gathering and analytics tools to serve the realities of CII implementation. (SEA GLOBE) with a direct monitoring and reporting route to CII compliance, in a significant new extension to cloud-based data gathering and analytics capabilities from METIS Cyberspace Technology.įrom 1 January 2023, the International Maritime Organization requires all ships of 5,000 GT and above to derive their CII (the Carbon Intensity Index), using a formula applied under SEEMP III - the UN agency’s third Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan scheme. (SEA WORLD) and Sea Globe Management and Trading Inc. Machine Learning and AI are providing ship operators Sea World Management and Trading Inc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |